"Kiki" said:
What made you guess that one?
Okay, in the post a few back where you posted 4:
First one was with the E-510, at 180mm.
Second was with the S3IS, so I disregarded it (and it appeared to have the most reach)
The last one with the G&R one chewing on the post was at 18mm.
And your last B&Y one was at 171mm, so I guessed that you had an 18-200ish lens, but was confused by the 180mm one, so I looked on Olympus' website and saw the 18-180. It seems that everybody except for Canon has one of those size lenses.
So I know:
180mm = 360mm equiv
18=36mm equiv
I'm getting used to having an all-in-one for the really the first time.
With 35mm my workhorse was 28-105, and I'd use my 20mm sometimes and for telephoto I really only got out to 200mm for the longest time. Switch over to digital and my workhorse became 45-168. Moved up in the L series, and Canon's all-in-one (that isn't a bazooka) hasn't been updated for the digital era, it's still 28-200. And it's really not that good. But the L equiv to my workhorse was the 24-105, so I would still have to use multiple zooms...
Now I'm looking forward to using one lens most of the time, and then switching to an ultra-wide angle (hey maybe the Tokina 12-24 price will drop like a rock when the new one arrives stateside!)