Actually, I haven't found the EVF vs OVF debate to be quite as bad as oft rumored to be - I use both when shooting birds-in-flight, which with the smaller and faster birds is usually where that EVF lag is always brought up as being a deal-killer...yet I haven't found it to be all that much more difficult to follow the action while firing a burst - I've been able to keep up my panning/tracking even with swallows, swifts, martins, and other tiny fast erratic missles. I've predominantly used the 6fps mode, rather than the 11fps - but from what I'm told the 11fps mode refreshes the EVF even faster so it theoretically shouldn't be a hindrance. It's more a matter of just getting used to it. That said, I have always used OVF cameras, and I tend to like some of the other advantages they offer - much better battery life for one, a little less eye-strain maybe when shooting all day long, and a little better view of high-contrast scenes in bright light (though ironically the 'lower' res EVF on the A6000 is actually better to my eye than the higher-res NEX5/7/6 EVF - by turning down the res a touch, they seem to have squeezed in better handling of high contrast scenes without as much blown highlight and more shadow detail, and also less noisy and grainy in low light). One thing I find I am wishing my DSLR had are the essentially infinite focus points covering about 98% of the frame in the A6000 - when I go back to tracking with the DSLR, I forget that I need to make sure one of the 15 or so focus points clustered more in the center of the frame is on subject or I can miss - with the A6000 all I need to do is get the subject in the frame, and the system can find it and lay focus points on it...even way down in the lower right corner.