I'm very positive on the whole tablet concept, but I'm fairly strongly anti apple for some very specific reasons.
I stand by my prediction that that price for the data plan can't last. ; With the way AT&T is already complaining about the bandwidth used by their smartphone users there's no way they'll tolerate people using a bigger, more powerful device that's able to handle more data at a time. ; At the minimum I predict AT&T will be imposing severe speed penalties on people that download more than whatever they consider to be an acceptable amount, even as they continue to advertise the plan as unlimited. ; It's what Clear is doing with their Wimax service in Chicago.
Even with price wars coming that pricing won't last.
But on to tablets.. I DO like the idea of a tablet revolution. ; If the AT&T deal somehow turns out to be genuine, reliable, and their service actually works, $30 a month for data for the Ipad looks to be a pretty good deal. ; And while I'll definitely hold out for either an Android tablet device (they're probably coming) or a tablet running a stock windows OS (not ideal for the tablet paradigm, but workable), I can believe that Apple may have done some things right with this device. ; Just not enough to win me over. ; Oh yeah, I'm also holding out for a tablet based on a newer generation of Intel CPUs that's expected this year.
The truth is, I'd probably get a tablet and then a bluetooth keyboard and I'd end up with the equivalent of a very expensive netbook. ; But one that can be made slimmer and more portable by dropping the keyboard and just taking the base tablet hardware. ; I favor sticking with an MS OS because I can retain access to all my usual programs. ; I'm not entirely thrilled with all the cheapo apps that have come out for the Iphone app store. ; I'm sure there are some entertaining and a few genuinely useful ones, but.. I have plenty of useful apps on my PC already, I'm happy to stick with what I know. ; The downside of this approach is that I lose the possibility of having software that can run while the system is on standby, say, allowing me to receive IMs or whatever while the system isn't turned on.
But as a PC it'll be far more expandable. ; I don't have to wait for someone to both write the software for the brand new platform and to also come out with a way to get around the IO limitations of the Ipad (no USB port? ; Seriously???). ; Tablet PCs running an MS OS will have the USB ports and the hardware and software to use those ports already exists. ; It would be fairly easy to add on a wireless USB adapter to get wireless connectivity with standard USB devices.
Scott, you mentioned a Wacom stylus.. not going to be an option. ; You CAN get tablet notebook PCs that have Wacom stylus hardware, that is the screen isn't a conventional touch screen, but it uses the Wacom wireless stylus tech. ; I've heard that they're not supposed to be the greatest for artistic use, but for casual photo editing use I wonder if they'd be adequate.
The Ipad has a capacitive touch screen. ; This is the tech of touch screens that's currently in fashion, I'm not so convinced it's such a big deal, but perhaps the only example of the tech I've used so far has been a poor implementation. ; I dunno. ; You absolutely cannot use normal styluses (stylii?) on it, because of the way it works, it senses the electrical properties of your skin and a normal stylus doesn't share those properties. ; You can get special styluses designed for capacitive screen use, but they still won't give you the kind of performance of a proper graphics tablet. ; Hmm.. it could be possible to come out with a freaky little specially designed stylus that uses the capacitive screen for positional data and then a bluetooth data connection to transmit pressure data.. but that's a highly specialized product that I doubt anyone is going to come out with. ; Still, if the Ipad becomes a big enough hit.. who knows.
I actually would favor a tablet designed specifically for use with a proper stylus. ; I am going against the trend here in that I am NOT in favor of having to drag my finger across a computer screen to use the computer. ; Simply because of getting finger oil all over the screen, it really goes against my instincts to touch a computer screen. ; Well, and for precision. ; I have no problem using a stylus, I still use a stylus on my phone most of the time.
Mind you I'd like to play with a proper desktop interface with a more evolved iteration of multitouch.. I want to be able to move two windows at once!
I do have one approving nod to make towards the Ipad.. they went with an IPS panel for the display. ; Good choice. ; I mean it's nice that it gives a wider viewing angle and everything (unless you're in a crowded public place and don't want people to be shoulder surfing you), but it also is a good panel tech for graphics work.
So long as it doesn't have the problems that Apple has had with some of the screens on their Imacs, anyway.