This is an opinion-type thread...
I have the Sony NEX-6 with the following lenses: 16-50PZ, 18-200 (silver), 10-18, 55-210, 16 f/2.8, 12mm 2.8 converter, 10mm 2.8 converter.
My gear, based on a B&H rough quote is worth $1235.
Do I 1.) upgrade the NEX-6 to the A6000 or 2.) Switch to an OM-D m4/3 system?
Caveats - I am (mostly) pleased with the NEX-6 but there are some things that I am not totally thrilled with - but most of those things are most likely because I use a Canon 1Dx, top of the line pro body so it's not a totally fair comparison. When the NEX-6 hits it, it NAILS it and the image quality is fantastic (I LOVE the in-camera HDR mode and some of the apps you can download).
My only real concern is the lack of Sony lenses as compared to the m4/3 which are much more plentiful and generally a lot less expensive.
Opinions?
I have the Sony NEX-6 with the following lenses: 16-50PZ, 18-200 (silver), 10-18, 55-210, 16 f/2.8, 12mm 2.8 converter, 10mm 2.8 converter.
My gear, based on a B&H rough quote is worth $1235.
Do I 1.) upgrade the NEX-6 to the A6000 or 2.) Switch to an OM-D m4/3 system?
Caveats - I am (mostly) pleased with the NEX-6 but there are some things that I am not totally thrilled with - but most of those things are most likely because I use a Canon 1Dx, top of the line pro body so it's not a totally fair comparison. When the NEX-6 hits it, it NAILS it and the image quality is fantastic (I LOVE the in-camera HDR mode and some of the apps you can download).
My only real concern is the lack of Sony lenses as compared to the m4/3 which are much more plentiful and generally a lot less expensive.
Opinions?